Skip to content
REALSOCIALISMO
History • Ideology • Consequences

The Liquidators of Chernobyl

In the early hours of 26 April 1986, Reactor No. 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Soviet Ukraine exploded. The blast tore the roof from the reactor building, threw burning graphite and radioactive debris into the…

ABOUT THIS VIDEO

In the early hours of 26 April 1986, Reactor No. 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Soviet Ukraine exploded. The blast tore the roof from the reactor building, threw burning graphite and radioactive debris into the night sky, and started fires that would burn for days. It was the worst nuclear accident the world had ever seen, and it happened in a country whose leaders had spent decades telling their citizens that Soviet technology was safe, modern and under control. The men and women sent in to contain the disaster became known as the liquidators, and their story is one of extraordinary courage, terrible confusion and a state that first hid the truth and then demanded that ordinary people pay for its mistakes.

The Night the Reactor Exploded

Reactor No. 4 was being shut down for a safety test when the disaster occurred. The test was meant to check whether the reactor’s turbines could keep the cooling pumps running during a loss of power, but a combination of design flaws in the RBMK reactor, operator errors and decisions taken under pressure caused power to surge out of control. The explosion that followed was a steam explosion powerful enough to destroy the reactor and to release a vast cloud of radioactive material into the atmosphere. Fires broke out in the reactor hall and on the roof, where burning graphite posed a danger that the plant’s own firefighters, who arrived within minutes, had no training or equipment to deal with.

The plant was near the town of Pripyat, built to house the workers and their families, and for more than a day the people of Pripyat lived with the disaster without being told what had happened. Children went to school, families enjoyed a warm spring weekend, and the local authorities waited for instructions from Moscow. The evacuation did not begin until the afternoon of 27 April, when buses arrived and residents were told to take only what they needed for a few days. They never returned. The delay was the product of a political culture in which bad news travelled upwards slowly and in which the state instinctively treated information as something to be controlled rather than shared.

Who the Liquidators Were

The word liquidator covered a vast and varied group of people. There were the firefighters who arrived on the first night, the plant workers who stayed at their posts to prevent further damage, and the soldiers and reservists called up from across the Soviet Union to work at the site. There were the helicopter pilots who flew again and again over the open reactor, dropping sand, clay, lead and boron onto the burning core. There were the drivers who carried contaminated material away, the builders who constructed the concrete shelter, known as the sarcophagus, over the ruined reactor, and the workers who decontaminated villages and buried contaminated topsoil across Ukraine and Belarus.

Two groups have become especially emblematic. The first were the miners, brought in to dig a tunnel beneath the reactor so that a cooling system could be installed and a second explosion prevented. They worked in intense heat, in shifts that lasted only minutes, digging by hand because machinery could not operate in the conditions. The second were the men sent onto the roof to clear radioactive debris that machines, including robots sent from abroad, had failed to remove. They were nicknamed bio-robots, because they were doing the work robots could not, and they worked in bursts of only a minute or two. Their courage is beyond question, and so is the fact that they were sent into danger their superiors understood far better than they did.

Secrecy, Delay and the Price of Silence

The Soviet government’s first response was to say as little as possible. The first official announcement, broadcast two days after the explosion, admitted that an accident had occurred but gave no sense of its scale. In the days that followed, the authorities in Kyiv went ahead with the traditional May Day parade, while in Sweden, where monitoring stations had detected the radioactive cloud, scientists were the first to alert the world that something serious had happened. Only when the evidence became impossible to deny did Moscow admit the gravity of the disaster, and even then the full story emerged slowly, through the work of scientists such as Valery Legasov, who led the official investigation.

That secrecy had a human cost far beyond the plant itself. People in the countryside continued to drink milk, eat vegetables and work in fields that had been contaminated, because no one had told them not to. Children were exposed to radioactive iodine, which the thyroid gland absorbs, and in the years that followed doctors recorded a sharp rise in thyroid cancer among children in the affected regions. The liquidators themselves were often given little information about the radiation, little protective equipment and little follow-up medical care. Many were young men called up as reservists, who understood that they were doing dangerous work but had no real way to judge how dangerous it was.

The Sarcophagus and the Long Clean-Up

The immediate priority was to stop the release of radioactive material and to contain the ruined reactor. The sarcophagus, built over Reactor No. 4 in the months after the accident, was a remarkable feat of engineering under appalling conditions. Around the plant, the authorities established a thirty-kilometre exclusion zone, from which tens of thousands of people were evacuated and to which they were never allowed to return. Villages were abandoned, homes left to decay, and a landscape farmed for centuries became a place of empty houses and overgrown fields.

What the Video Contributes, and the Legacy

The documentary at the centre of this chapter draws on first-hand accounts and archive material to show what the clean-up really cost. It follows the firefighters to the burning reactor, the miners to the tunnel beneath it, the helicopter crews to the open core and the roof workers to the most radioactive place on earth. Its strength is that it does not present the liquidators as abstractions or statistics. It presents them as individuals, with names, families and voices, and it allows the viewer to sit with the moral weight of what they were asked to do. The film also captures the tension at the heart of the story: the liquidators were both victims and heroes, victims of a system that concealed the danger and heroes because they went anyway.

The legacy of Chernobyl is still with us. The exclusion zone remains, the new confinement structure must be maintained for many decades, and the health of the liquidators and of the people who lived in the contaminated regions continues to be studied and debated. The exact number of people whose health was harmed is a subject of continuing dispute, and honest discussion must acknowledge that uncertainty rather than offering a single, simple figure. What is not in dispute is that the disaster revealed the system’s deepest flaws and changed the way the world thought about nuclear power, about the responsibility of governments to tell the truth, and about the price of technological ambition without accountability.